III. PUBLICATIONS
In Press | 2013| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2000
Inzlicht, M. & Schmader, T. (2012). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application. New York: Oxford University Press.
[Order a copy of the book]
Hogeveen, J., Inzlicht, M., & Obhi, S. S. (in press). Power changes how the brain responds to others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (in press). Beyond simple utility in predicting self-control fatigue: A proximate alternative to the opportunity cost model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[PDF]
Legault, L., & Inzlicht, M. (in press). Self-determination, self-regulation, and the brain: Autonomy improves performance by enhancing neuroaffective responsiveness to self-regulation failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., & Legault, L. (in press). No pain, no gain: How distress underlies effective self-control (and unites diverse social psychological phenomena). In J. Forgas & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), The Control Within: Motivation and its Regulation. New York: Psychology Press.
[PDF]
Gutsell, J.N., & Inzlicht, M. (in press). Using EEG mu-suppression to explore group biases in motor resonance. In B. Derks, D. Scheepers and N. Ellemers (Eds.). The Neuroscience of Prejudice. London: Psychology Press.
[PDF]
Tullett, A., Prentice, M., Nash, K., Teper, R., Inzlicht, M., & McGregor, I. (in press). Neural foundations of meaning and threat. In K. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. Linberg (Eds.). The Psychology of Meaning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[PDF]
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (in press). A Neuroaffective perspective on why people fail to live a sustainable lifestyle. In H. van Trijp (Ed.). Multiple selves: Angels, demons, and sustainable behavior. London: Psychology Press.
[PDF]
Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Meditation, mindfulness, and executive control: The importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 8, 85-92. doi:10.1093/scan/nss045.
[PDF]
Brown, K. W., Goodman, R, &, Inzlicht, M. (2013). Dispositional mindfulness and the attenuation of neural responses to emotional stimuli. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 8, 93-99. doi:10.1093/scan/nss004
[PDF]
Schmeichel, B. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Incidental and integral effects of emotions on self-control. In M. D. Robinson, E. R. Watkins, and E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 272-290). New York: Guilford Press.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450-463. doi:10.1177/1745691612454134
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., & Al-Khindi, T. (2012). ERN and the placebo: A misattribution approach to studying the arousal properties of the error-related negativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 799-807. doi: 10.1037/a0027586.
[PDF]
Legault, L., Al-Khindi, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Preserving integrity in the face of performance threat: Self-affirmation enhances neurophysiological responsiveness to errors. Psychological Science, 23, 1455-1460. doi:10.1177/0956797612448483.
[PDF]
Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). The five ‘A’s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning of the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 317-335.
[PDF]
Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Moderated disanxiousuncertlibrium: Specifying the moderating and neuroaffective determinants of violation-compensation effects. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 386-396.
[PDF]
Tritt, S. M., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Toward a biological understanding of mortality salience (and other threat compensation processes). Social Cognition, 6, 715-733.
[PDF]
Tullett, A. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Right-frontal cortical asymmetry predicts empathic reactions: Support for a link between withdrawal motivation and empathy. Psychophysiology, 49, 1145-1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01395.x.
[PDF]
Nash, K., Inzlicht, M., & McGregor, I. D. (in press). Approach-related left prefrontal EEG asymmetry predicts muted error-related negativity. Biological Psychology. doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.005.
[PDF]
Proulx, T., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 285-291.
[PDF]
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: Neural evidence of an empathy gap. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 7, 596-603. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr035
[PDF]
Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Stigma building blocks: How instruction and experience teach children about rejection by out-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 357-369.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Gutsell, J. N., & Legault, L. (2012). Mimicry reduces prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 361-365.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). Introduction. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.).Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 3-14). New York: Oxford University Press.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A., & Gutsell, J. N. (2012). Stereotype threat spillover. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 107-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M. (2011). The need to believe: A neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process. Religion, Brain, & Behavior, 1, 192-212.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M. (2011). Existential Neuroscience: A Proximate Explanation of Religion as Flexible Meaning and Palliative. Religion, Brain, & Behavior, 1, 244-251.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., Legault, L., & Kang, S. K. (2011). Lingering Effects: Stereotype Threat Hurts More than You Think. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227-256.
[PDF]
Legault, L., Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of anti-prejudice messages: How motivational intervention reduces (but also increases) prejudice.Psychological Science, 22, 1472–1477.
[PDF]
Tullett, A. M., Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Confronting threats to meaning: A new framework for understanding responses to unsettling events. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 447-453.
[PDF]
Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Active transgressions and moral elusions: Action framing influences moral behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 284-288.
[PDF]
Teper, R., Inzlicht, M., & Page-Gould, E. (2011). Are we more moral than we think? Exploring the role of affect in moral behavior and moral forecasting. Psychological Science, 22, 553-558.
[PDF]
Phills, C.E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197-210.
[PDF]
Harmon-Jones, C., Schmeichel, B., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2011). Trait approach motivation relates to dissonance reduction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 21-28.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M. & Kang, S. K. (2010). Stereotype threat spillover: How coping with threats to social identity affects, aggression, eating, decision-making, and attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 467-481.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M, & Tullett, A. M. (2010). Reflecting on God: Religious primes can reduce neurophysiological response to errors. Psychological Science, 21, 1184 – 1190.
[PDF]
Tullett, A. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). The Voice of self-control: Blocking the inner voice increases impulsive responding. Acta Psychologica, 135, 252-256.
[PDF]
Nash, K., McGregor, I., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Line bisection as a neural marker of approach motivation. Psychophysiology. 47, 979–983.
[PDF]
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Empathy constrained: Prejudice predicts reduced mental simulation of actions during observation of outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 841-845.
[PDF]
Robinson, M. D., Schmeichel, B. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). How does the self control itself? Questions and considerations based on a cognitive control perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 189-200.
[PDF]
Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Error-related negativity predicts academic performance. Psychophysiology, 47, 192-196.
[PDF]
Kang, S. K., Inzlicht, M., & Derks, B. (2010). Social Neuroscience and Public Policy on Intergroup Relations: A Hegelian Analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 585-601.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385-392.
[PDF]
McGregor, I., Nash, K., & Inzlicht, M. (2009). Threat, High Self-Esteem, and Reactive Approach Motivation: Electroencephalographic Evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1003-1007.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2009). On being the target of prejudice: Educational implications. In F. Butera & J. Levine (Eds.) Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion (pp. 13-36). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2008). The face of chauvinism: How prejudice expectations shape perceptions of facial affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 758–766.
[PDF]
Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype Threat and Executive Resource Depletion: The Influence of Emotion Regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691-705.
[PDF]
Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2008). The devil you know: Neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychological Science, 19, 962-967.
[PDF]
Derks, B., Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. (2008). The Neuroscience of Stigma and Stereotype Threat.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 163-181.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M. & Gutsell, J. N. (2007). Running on empty: Neural signals for self-control failure.Psychological Science, 18, 933-937.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stigma as ego depletion: How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17, 262-269.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., Good, C., & McKay, L. (2006). A particular resiliency to threatening environments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323-336.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M. & Good, C. (2006). How environments threaten academic performance, self-knowledge, and sense of belonging. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 129-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[PDF]
Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Stereotype Threat and Arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174-181.
[PDF]
Ben-Zeev, T., Carrasquillo C. M, Ching, A., Kliengklom, T. J., McDonald, K. L, Newhall, D. C., Patton, G. E., Stewart, T. D., Stoddard, T, Inzlicht, M., & Fein, S. (2005). “Math is hard!” (Barbie, 1994): Responses of threat vs. challenge mediated arousal to stereotypes alleging intellectual inferiority. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics (pp. 189-206). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
[PDF]
Aronson, J. & Inzlicht, M. (2004). The Ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African-American students. Psychological Science, 15, 829-836.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Do high-achieving female students underperform in private? The implications of threatening environments on intellectual processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 796-805.
[PDF]
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving Adolescents’ Standardized Test Performance: An Intervention to Reduce the Effects of Stereotype Threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662.
[PDF]
Herz, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2002). Gender differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection: The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 359-364.
[PDF]
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
[PDF]
